A meta-analysis of 39 studies found that 75 percent of mHealth interventions were cost-effective or economically beneficial compared to non-mobile alternatives.
We know anecdotally that mobile health solutions can be cost effective and cost saving. Physicians that use our Mobius Clinic app tell us all the time, and a quick review of the explosion of mHealth apps shows how mobility is creating value in healthcare.But an article published earlier this year in PLoS One digs deeper into the economic evidence for mHealth. The authors reviewing existing literature and report that about 75 percent of studied mHealth interventions were found to be “cost-effective, economically beneficial, or cost saving.”
Long story short, there's evidence that mHealth is economically efficient compared to similar non-mobile interventions. But if you take a closer look, the paper also offers an interesting snapshot of mHealth interventions as of 2017.Published in February, the paper is a meta analysis that reviews 39 studies from 19 countries, including interventions related to primary health, behavior change and text message communication. The most common disease and condition focuses were outpatient clinic attendance, cardiovascular disease and diabetes.The authors’ takeaway message is clear - “Findings highlight a growing body of economic evidence for mHealth interventions.” Building this economic evidence for mHealth is important because it can help guide decision makers or funders. Providers and donors should always choose interventions that improve health outcomes the most for the lowest cost, and rigorous, peer-reviewed research is one important way to compare and evaluate approaches.
“Findings highlight a growing body of economic evidence for mHealth interventions.”
Beyond supporting the cost-effectiveness of mHealth interventions, here are a few highlights from the article published earlier this year.
While findings support the cost effectiveness of mHealth interventions, the authors also make a cautionary note.The authors reviewed but ultimately excluded many articles that simply assumed mHealth interventions would be cost effective without providing any evidence. As they summarize, "of the excluded studies during screening, 57% included statements of cost-effectiveness or cost in the abstract or title but upon further evaluation did not provide enough detail to be considered a partial or full economic evaluation."The conclude by saying that researchers should do a better job of following established economic reporting guidelines to improve the body of evidence for mHealth.http://45.33.12.216/blog/2017/11/status-mhealth-apps-11-facts/
We proudly offer enterprise-ready solutions for large clinical practices and hospitals.
Whether you’re looking for a universal dictation platform or want to improve the documentation efficiency of your workforce, we’re here to help.